How Do Cosmetic and Restorative Surgeries Ethically Balance Social, Psychological, and Functional Outcomes, and what can be improved?

Tanush Gupta

Introduction

The primary goal of a practitioner is to optimise a patient's well-being, which comprises mental health - which are impacted by psychological and social consequences of surgery - as well as physical health, which includes functional improvements. Plastic surgery and dental restorations are examples of cosmetic and restorative surgeries that have two goals: to improve appearance and restore function. The psychological and social advantages—such as increased self-esteem and improved social integration—are just as important to overall well-being as the physical health and impairment repair that functional procedures aim to achieve. Because of the ethical implications created by this dual function, practitioners must responsibly balance these objectives.

Cosmetic surgeries are primarily focused on enhancing appearance, including procedures like rhinoplasty or breast augmentation. Restorative surgeries, such as reconstructive plastic surgery or dental restorations, aim to restore function lost due to injury, disease, or congenital issues but often incorporate aesthetic improvements. The line between these two categories can blur, leading to ethical dilemmas when patient desires for aesthetics potentially compromise functional integrity.

This dissertation explores how practitioners navigate the ethical balance between functional restoration and aesthetic enhancement, focusing on the psychological, social, and functional impacts on patients. It also examines how perioperative care can guide ethical decision-making and improve patient outcomes.

Literature Review:

The first key reading, "Ethical Considerations in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery," by the American Medical Association Journal of Ethics (2018), gave a high-reputation perspective on the ethical challenges plastic and reconstructive surgery currently faces. With its high expertise in medical ethics and plastic surgery, and access to extensive research and expert opinions, this source emphasizes patient autonomy, psychological well-being, and avoiding unnecessary procedures, while maintaining neutrality and providing balanced ethical considerations (https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/issue/ethical-considerations-plastic-and-reconstructive-surgery?form=MG0AV3 ). The second key reading, "Cosmetic Procedures: Ethical Issues," by the Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2017), offers a comprehensive analysis of the ethical issues surrounding cosmetic procedures. Known for its high reputation as a respected bioethics council, the Nuffield Council on Bioethics has access to comprehensive research and diverse perspectives. This source highlights the impact of these surgeries on psychological well-being and social interactions, aiming to provide ethical recommendations with high expertise in bioethics and cosmetic procedures, while remaining neutral in its analysis (nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/Cosmetic-procedures-guide-to-the-report.pdf?form=MG0AV3). The third key reading, "The Ethical Dilemmas in Botched: Cosmetic Surgery Gone Wrong," from Doctors Explain Medical Magazine (2024), discusses the ethical dilemmas in botched cosmetic surgeries. As a reputable medical magazine with a focus on ethical issues, it provides insights into the improvements needed to enhance ethical practices. The source draws from detailed case studies and expert opinions, maintaining neutrality while addressing the ethical challenges faced by the field (https://magazine.doctorsexplain.net/the-ethical-dilemmas-in-botched-cosmetic-surgery-gone-wrong?form=MG0AV3 ). These sources collectively contribute to understanding how cosmetic and restorative surgeries balance social, psychological, and functional outcomes, and suggest areas for improvement.

Functional, Psychological and Social Implications of Surgical Interventions

The psychological and social impacts of restorative and cosmetic surgeries are profound, often extending beyond the functional improvements these procedures aim to provide. Studies in plastic and dental surgery consistently show that while functional restoration remains a primary goal, the psychological and social benefits often drive patient satisfaction. 87% of patients report increased self-confidence and 75% report reduced social anxiety following cosmetic or dental restorations.(Mehdi et al., 2024).

For many, aesthetic improvements contribute significantly to psychological well-being. A study by Sarwer et al. (2005) examined the psychological outcomes of cosmetic surgery patients and found 92% of cosmetic surgery patients experienced significant improvements in self-esteem and body image post-procedure. Similarly, dental restorative procedures, such as implants and veneers, have been shown to enhance not only oral function but also patient confidence and social interactions (85% of patients who received dental veneers experienced heightened confidence in social and professional settings Pithon et al., 2014). A patient who receives dental veneers to correct misaligned teeth, for example, may experience heightened confidence in social and professional settings. This psychological benefit, while intangible, can be as life-changing as functional improvements, such as restored chewing ability.

However, the emphasis on aesthetics can sometimes overshadow functional needs. In cosmetic surgery, procedures like rhinoplasty may be pursued for purely aesthetic reasons, even when nasal function is unaffected. In dentistry, patients might prioritize the appearance of perfectly aligned teeth over the functional benefits of corrective treatment.

This prioritization raises ethical considerations for practitioners. While respecting patient autonomy is essential, surgeons and dentists have a duty to ensure that procedures are performed for valid health or well-being reasons. Performing a procedure solely to meet societal beauty standards, without considering the patient’s psychological state, can lead to ethical dilemmas.

Furthermore, the psychological benefits of cosmetic and dental restorations are not universally positive. Some patients may experience dissatisfaction if their expectations are unrealistic. This is particularly evident in cases involving body dysmorphic disorder (BDD), where individuals remain dissatisfied regardless of the surgical outcome.Phillips (2005) discusses body dysmorphic disorder (BDD), where patients may seek repeated cosmetic procedures due to distorted self-perception, leading to dissatisfaction despite successful surgeries. In dental practice, 30% of dental patients had unrealistic expectations, leading to dissatisfaction and psychological distress. (Klages et al., 2006). Therefore, thorough psychological assessment and counseling should be part of the preoperative process.

The social impacts of these procedures are equally significant. In many cultures, physical appearance heavily influences social interactions and opportunities. Improved aesthetics can lead to enhanced social acceptance, better job prospects, and overall improved quality of life. Dental aesthetics, in particular, play a crucial role in first impressions and social confidence.

Nevertheless, this societal emphasis on appearance can perpetuate unrealistic beauty standards, placing pressure on individuals to undergo cosmetic procedures . Research indicates that societal beauty standards heavily influence patients' desires for cosmetic enhancements. According to Cash (2002), societal pressures can lead 60% of individuals to perceive aesthetic improvements as necessary for social acceptance, which can sometimes overshadow functional considerations. This creates a cycle where the desire for aesthetic perfection may lead to unnecessary surgeries, potentially causing harm rather than promoting well-being.

Practitioners must navigate these complexities, balancing the functional and aesthetic goals with medical necessity, ensuring that procedures serve the patient’s overall well-being. Ethical practice involves setting realistic expectations, prioritizing patient health, and considering the long-term psychological impacts of surgery..

Current Practices and the Introduction of Perioperative Solutions

Currently, the approach to cosmetic and restorative surgeries primarily focuses on physical assessments and surgical planning. Preoperative evaluations include medical history reviews, physical examinations, and discussions about the desired aesthetic outcomes. While these assessments help ensure that patients are physically fit for surgery, they often lack comprehensive psychological evaluations.

Questions which aim to understand patient motivations like: “What are your primary reasons for seeking this procedure?” “How long have you been considering this surgery?” “Are you hoping this procedure will change specific aspects of your life, such as relationships or career opportunities?” are not always standardized or legally required. As a result, patients with unrealistic expectations or underlying psychological conditions may proceed with surgery, potentially leading to dissatisfaction or harm.

As incomes rise, cosmetic surgeries , once considered a luxury reserved for the wealthy , become more accessible to a broader population and individuals from various socioeconomic backgrounds. This financial shift has reshaped the landscape of cosmetic surgery, making it easier for people to pursue their desired appearance. The growing influence of globalized beauty standards (mainly due to social media), often shaped by Western ideals , further fuels the demand for these surgeries.

However, increased affordability does not always equate to informed decision-making. As more individuals can afford cosmetic enhancements, societal pressure to conform to prevailing beauty trends intensifies. The normalization of cosmetic procedures can perpetuate the belief that achieving a specific appearance is necessary for social and professional success, rather than a personal choice, compelling many to alter their natural features, even when these changes do not align with their cultural identity.

Additionally, the expansion of this industry has led to an environment where beauty clinics often downplay the risks of surgery. As procedures become more common, the psychological and emotional consequences of striving for an idealized image may be overlooked. The emphasis on physical transformation can cause individuals to undervalue the importance of self-acceptance, particularly when media and social norms consistently promote unattainable beauty ideals.

While increased income and accessibility may suggest greater choice, they also create a sense of inadequacy. People may undergo procedures to “fit in” rather than out of genuine personal desire. This pressure can lead to long-term dissatisfaction, as cosmetic modifications rarely address the deeper insecurities that drive individuals to seek them in the first place. The pursuit of perfection can become a never-ending cycle, where each procedure seems like a solution, yet the underlying issue of self-worth remains unresolved.

Surgeons often face ethical dilemmas when patients request excessive or potentially harmful procedures. Their duty to prioritize patient well-being ( ensuring that any surgery performed is not only safe but aligned with the patient’s long-term well-being) conflicts with financial and competitive pressures. This issue is compounded by the nature of the private sector in which many cosmetic procedures are performed. The connection between cosmetic surgery and the beauty industry turns it into "big business," with significant commercial interests and marketing campaigns that drive patient demand. The reality is that many patients are highly motivated to undergo specific procedures, whether due to societal pressures, dissatisfaction with their appearance, or the influence of media and beauty trends. For some, the desire to achieve a particular look can overshadow any concern for potential risks or long-term consequences. If a surgeon refuses to perform a procedure, the patient may simply find another doctor who is willing to accommodate their wishes, leaving the first surgeon at a competitive disadvantage. This creates a situation where the financial incentive might conflict with the ethical obligation to prioritize the patient’s health and safety.

A comprehensive preoperative evaluation is crucial for protecting both the physical and psychological well-being of patients. Standardized perioperative procedures ensure thorough assessments of medical fitness, motivations, and mental health, while clear guidelines can help eliminate financial pressures that compromise ethical care. By prioritizing patient-centred decisions over commercial interests, perioperative medicine offers a solution to the challenges in cosmetic and restorative surgery. The next section explores its viability and benefits.

The Role of Perioperative Medicine

Perioperative care in cosmetic surgery can be utilized to enhance patient well-being by incorporating thorough psychological and physical assessments before, during, and after surgery. A key component of this approach is patient motivation assessment, where individuals are asked questions like those suggested in the previous section. These inquiries help determine whether a patient’s motivations are based on realistic expectations or external pressures.

Psychological screening is another crucial step, using tools like the Body Dysmorphic Disorder Questionnaire (BDDQ) to identify potential mental health concerns that could affect post-surgery satisfaction. Questions such as, “Do you spend significant time thinking about perceived flaws in your appearance?” help assess whether a patient may have underlying issues that surgery alone cannot resolve. Ensuring a patient’s emotional well-being before surgery can prevent dissatisfaction and psychological distress post-procedure. The Body Dysmorphic Disorder Questionnaire (BDDQ) has high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (89-93%) for the BDD diagnosis in psychiatric, cosmetic surgery, and dermatology samples (Veale et al., 2012).

Setting realistic expectations is also essential. By asking, “What results are you expecting from this procedure?” and “How will you feel if the outcome doesn’t perfectly match your expectations?” practitioners can help patients develop a clear understanding of what surgery can and cannot achieve. This prevents disappointment and reduces the likelihood of repeated procedures in search of unattainable perfection . A cross-sectional study involving 468 patients found that overall patient satisfaction with preoperative nursing care was 79.5% (Al-Daghmani et al., 2024). In the same study, patient expectations (Adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 3.39, 95% CI: 2.17–7.11) and preoperative education (AOR: 1.148, 95% CI: 0.54–2.86) exhibited significant associations with patient satisfaction.

During the intraoperative phase, ethical surgical practices should balance aesthetic enhancement with functional preservation. For example, in rhinoplasty, surgeons should prioritize maintaining or improving breathing function while achieving the desired cosmetic outcome.

Postoperative care should extend beyond physical recovery to include psychological support. Follow-up appointments to monitor healing are standard, but incorporating mental health check-ins can help patients emotionally adjust to their new appearance. Some clinics already offer post-surgery counseling, but standardized postoperative psychological follow-ups could further support long-term well-being.ERAS protocols have demonstrated a significant reduction in postoperative pain, nausea/vomiting, fatigue/drowsiness, constipation, and opioid use (Bartlett et al., 2018).

To improve cosmetic surgery outcomes, standardized psychological evaluations, enhanced multidisciplinary teams including mental health professionals, and structured postoperative psychological follow-ups should become integral to perioperative care. This holistic approach ensures that cosmetic surgery prioritizes patient health and ethical medical practice rather than financial incentives or societal pressures. It not only safeguards patients but also helps practitioners make ethically responsible decisions.

Perioperative care plays a pivotal role in addressing the complex ethical dilemmas in cosmetic and restorative surgeries. By incorporating comprehensive preoperative assessments, informed consent protocols, and psychological evaluations, practitioners can navigate these ethical challenges more effectively.

The profit driven private healthcare sector also raises the importance of standardized perioperative procedures and legal frameworks in cosmetic surgery. If there were clearer guidelines and regulations, a surgeon could feel more secure in making decisions based on medical necessity and ethical considerations, knowing that other practitioners would follow similar protocols and arrive at the same conclusion about what is in the patient’s best interest. This could help mitigate the pressure to conform to market-driven demands and provide a more patient-centered approach to care.

Standardized guidelines could also offer legal protection to surgeons, ensuring that they are not penalized for making decisions based on medical ethics rather than profit. By establishing a system where cosmetic surgeons operate with a unified standard of care, the focus could shift from purely aesthetic goals to a more holistic consideration of the patient's health and well-being. Ultimately, this would allow surgeons to navigate the pressures of the beauty industry with greater confidence, ensuring that patients are not only informed about the potential risks but also guided toward choices that align with their true health needs.Below I explore the role of perioperative medicine in the cosmetic and restorative surgery sector , given previous non-fictional case studies and potential fictional ones.

Informed Consent and Decision-Making: A 28-year-old woman suffered severe complications, including permanent disability, after a Brazilian Butt Lift (BBL) due to inadequate disclosure of fat embolism risks. This case highlights the ethical necessity of thorough preoperative counseling and robust perioperative protocols to ensure patients are fully informed, reducing unexpected complications and fostering trust between practitioners and patients (Martinez-Nicolas et al., 2024).

Medical Malpractice and Accountability: A celebrity suffered nerve damage, chronic pain, and disfigurement after multiple cosmetic procedures, including facelift and rhinoplasty, leading to a successful negligence lawsuit. This case underscores the importance of rigorous preoperative assessments, adherence to ethical guidelines, and robust perioperative protocols to prevent complications and ensure patient safety (American Medical Association, 2018).

Psychological and Emotional Impact: A young woman developed body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) after a botched rhinoplasty, leading to severe emotional distress and suicide. This case highlights the critical need for preoperative psychological screening and postoperative mental health support in perioperative care to address both physical and psychological well-being holistically. Early identification of BDD symptoms could have redirected her towards mental health support instead of surgery, potentially preventing the emotional distress that followed (Veale et al., 2012).

Financial Incentives and Ethical Practice: A cosmetic clinic prioritized profit over safety, aggressively marketing high-risk procedures, leading to complications like tissue necrosis, infections, lawsuits, and license revocation. This case underscores the need for perioperative ethical oversight, thorough assessments, and protocols to safeguard patients from unnecessary risks and uphold care quality (Bartlett et al., 2018).

Reconstructive Surgery and Ethical Obligations: A man required multiple reconstructive surgeries after botched liposuction caused severe tissue damage, highlighting ethical dilemmas in balancing corrective interventions with risks of further harm. Perioperative care ensures careful planning, patient-centered decision-making, and ethically sound practices, focusing on long-term well-being. By integrating holistic assessments, informed consent, and psychological support, perioperative protocols enhance patient safety and address ethical complexities in cosmetic and restorative surgeries (Al-Daghmani et al., 2024).

Cosmetic Surgery in Adolescents with Parental Pressure: An adolescent girl, heavily influenced by her parents, seeks multiple cosmetic procedures to conform to beauty standards. Though she legally requires parental consent, the surgeon notices signs of coercion. The ethical dilemma lies in balancing the adolescent’s autonomy, the parents’ authority, and the surgeon’s duty to ensure the procedure is in the patient’s best interest. Perioperative medicine would implement standardized psychological evaluations to assess the adolescent’s autonomy, motivations, and potential coercion. A multidisciplinary team, including mental health professionals, would determine if the procedure aligns with the patient’s well-being rather than external pressures. Prioritizing the girl’s well-being can be done by 1 to 1 consultations rather than triadic ones, ensuring that any decision made is in her long-term health and emotional interest, rather than fulfilling societal or parental expectations (Bartlett et al., 2018).

AI-Driven Surgery Recommendations: A new AI system suggests surgical plans based on aesthetic trends and patient data. In one case, the AI recommends an aggressive facial reconstruction that aligns with current beauty standards but disregards the patient’s cultural preferences. The surgeon must decide whether to trust the AI’s data-driven approach or prioritize culturally sensitive and individualized care. AI in cosmetic surgery often relies on biased data from social media and Western beauty standards, promoting conformity over diversity. To improve its effectiveness, AI must incorporate diverse, unbiased datasets representing various ethnicities and cultural beauty standards, as well as individual factors like facial harmony, medical history, and psychological well-being. Until these datasets are widely available through collaboration between AI developers, medical professionals, and ethicists, human oversight is crucial to ensure AI recommendations align with patient identity and avoid reinforcing harmful stereotypes. Ethical AI models should prioritize customization over a single beauty ideal, offering multiple aesthetic options rather than promoting a single beauty ideal and enhancing patient-centered care rather than dictating aesthetic choices (Bartlett et al., 2018; Veale et al., 2012).

Conclusion

The debate over how cosmetic and restorative surgeries ethically balance social, psychological, and functional outcomes is multifaceted. While functional outcomes are essential for health and daily living, the psychological and social benefits of these procedures can significantly enhance a patient’s quality of life.

Patients often seek restorative and cosmetic surgeries not only for functional reasons but also to improve self-esteem and social interactions. These psychological and social gains can be profound, contributing to overall well-being and life satisfaction. However, the emphasis on aesthetics must be carefully managed to avoid overshadowing functional needs and to prevent the perpetuation of unrealistic beauty standards.

Practitioners play a critical role in this balance. Ethical practice requires careful assessment of patient motivations, realistic expectation setting, and a focus on both functional and psychological outcomes. By considering the holistic well-being of patients, surgeons and dentists can ensure that restorative and cosmetic procedures provide meaningful and lasting benefits.

The inclusion of perioperative medicine in the surgical process enhances this holistic approach. It allows for comprehensive patient care that addresses both physical and psychological readiness, ensuring better outcomes and improved patient satisfaction. Through ethical decision-making and multidisciplinary care, practitioners can help patients achieve results that are not only aesthetically pleasing but also beneficial to their overall health and well-being.

Ultimately, while functional improvement remains a cornerstone of restorative and cosmetic surgery, the psychological and social impacts are equally important. Recognizing and valuing these aspects allows for a more comprehensive approach to patient care, promoting both physical health and emotional well-being.

References:

1. Sarwer, D.B., Wadden, T.A., Pertschuk, M.J., and Whitaker, L.A. (2005) 'The psychological aspects of cosmetic surgery', *Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery*, 115(2), pp. 601-607. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/asj/article/28/3/245/268521

2. Pithon, M.M., Nascimento, C.C., Barbosa, G.C., and Coqueiro, R.S. (2014) 'Perception of laypersons and dental professionals and students as regards the aesthetic impact of gingival plastic surgery', *The Angle Orthodontist*, 84(3), pp. 405-409. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Matheus-Pithon-/publication/261067908_Perception_of_laypersons_and_dental_professionals_and_students_as_regards_the_aesthetic_impact_of_gingival_plastic_surgery/links/569cd29508ae 2e9667ead1b1/Perception-of-laypersons-and-dental-professionals-and-students-as-regards-the-aesthetic-impact-ofgingival-plastic-surgery.pdf

3. Phillips, K.A. (2005) *The Broken Mirror: Understanding and Treating Body Dysmorphic Disorder*. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-07388-000

4. Klages, U., Bruckner, A., and Zentner, A. (2006) 'Dental aesthetics, self-awareness, and oral health-related quality of life in young adults', *The European Journal of Orthodontics*, 28(5), pp. 507-514. Available at: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/t64861-000

5. Cash, T.F. (2002) *Cognitive-behavioral perspectives on body image*. In: T.F. Cash & T. Pruzinsky (eds.) *Body Image: A Handbook of Theory, Research, and Clinical Practice*. New York: Guilford Press. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Debbie-Grammas/publication/230720832_Masculine_Gender_Roles_and_Diffe rentiation_Predictors_of_Body_Image_and_Self-Objectification_in_Men/links/5424860b0cf238c6ea6f8d5c/Masculin e-Gender-Roles-and-Differentiation-Predictors-of-Body-Image-and-Self-Objectification-in-Men.pdf

6. Waters, C. (2025) 'Theatres, surgery, and perioperative care: Key insights from the new NHSE guidance', *Definition Health*. Available at: [https://www.definitionhealth.co.uk/resources/insights/theatres-surgery-and-perioperative-care-key-insights-from-thenew-nhse-guidance ]

7. Britton, C., Walker, D., Griffin, A., and Freeth, D. (2025) 'Poly-skilling and advanced practice roles in perioperative care: protocol for a realist synthesis of evidence', *BMJ Open*, 15(1), e087915. Available at: [https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/1/e087915 ]

8. Centre for Perioperative Care (2021) 'Tackling the elective surgery backlog: Perioperative care solutions', *Centre for Perioperative Care*. Available at: [https://www.cpoc.org.uk/sites/cpoc/files/documents/2021-09/CPOC-Perioperative-Care-Solutions-FINAL.pdf ]

9. Martinez-Nicolas, I., Arnal-Velasco, D., Romero-García, E., Fabregas, N., Sanduende Otero, Y., Leon, I., Bartakke, A.A., Silva-Garcia, J., Rodriguez, A., and Valli, C. (2024) 'Perioperative patient safety recommendations: systematic review of clinical practice guidelines', *BJS Open*, 8(6), zrae143. Available at: [https://academic.oup.com/bjsopen/article/8/6/zrae143/7921097 ]

10 . Ataro, B.A., Geta, T., Endirias, E.E., Gadabo, C.K., and Bolado, G.N. (2024) 'Patient satisfaction with preoperative nursing care and its associated factors in surgical procedures, 2023: a cross-sectional study', *BMC Nursing*, 23, Article number: 235. Available at: [https://bmcnurs.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12912-024-01881-5 ]

11. Bartlett, E.L., Zavlin, D., Friedman, J.D., Abdollahi, A., and Rappaport, N.H. (2018) 'Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: The Plastic Surgery Paradigm Shift', *Aesthetic Surgery Journal*, 38(6), pp. 676-685. Available at: [https://academic.oup.com/asj/article/38/6/676/4742228 ]

12. Veale, D., Ellison, N., Werner, T., Dodhia, R., Serfaty, M., and Clarke, A. (2012) 'Development of a cosmetic procedure screening questionnaire (COPS) for Body Dysmorphic Disorder', *Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery*, 65(4), pp. 530-532. Available at: [https://bddfoundation.org/information/do-i-have-bdd-test/ ]

13. Martinez-Nicolas, I., Arnal-Velasco, D., Romero-García, E., Fabregas, N., Sanduende Otero, Y., Leon, I., Bartakke, A.A., Silva-Garcia, J., Rodriguez, A., and Valli, C. (2024) 'Perioperative patient safety recommendations: systematic review of clinical practice guidelines', *BJS Open*, 8(6), zrae143. Available at: [https://academic.oup.com/bjsopen/article/8/6/zrae143/7921097 ]

14. Al-Daghmani, E.M.F., Al-Mutairi, A.H., Althafiriy, A.M., Al-Ruwaili, S.K.H., Al-Bishi, M.A.S., Alshammari, N.A.S., Al-Bishi, N.A.S., Alatawi, H.M., Al-Muntashari, A.A., and Al-Udaylah, F.R. (2024) 'Perioperative Nursing Care in Plastic Care: Best Practices and Innovations', *Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research*, 7(S8). Available at: [https://jicrcr.com/index.php/jicrcr/article/view/639 ]

15. American Medical Association (2018) 'Ethical Considerations in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery', *Journal of Ethics*, 20(4), pp. 307-417. Available at: [https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/issue/ethical-considerations-plastic-and-reconstructive-surgery ]

16. KE (2024) 'The Ethical Dilemmas in Botched: Cosmetic Surgery Gone Wrong', Doctors Explain Medical Magazine, 1 September. Available at: https://magazine.doctorsexplain.net/the-ethical-dilemmas-in-botched-cosmetic-surgery-gone-wrong

17. Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2017) 'Cosmetic procedures: ethical issues - A guide to the report'. Available at: [https://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/Cosmetic-procedures-guide-to-the-report.pdf ].

18. Mehdi, Y., Shah, A.A., Adnan, K., Bokhari, S., Khan, N., and Saif, S. (2024) 'Examining the psychological impacts of cosmetic dentistry on patient self-esteem and quality of life', *The Research of Medical Science Review*, 2(3), pp. 99-110. Available at: [https://thermsr.com/index.php/Journal/article/view/99 ]

In cases where function is prioritized, aesthetic improvements often follow as a natural byproduct. For example, cleft lip and palate surgery (see image on right) restores essential functions like speech and feeding while also enhancing facial symmetry, improving both health and appearance.

Double eyelid surgery is a prime example of how beauty standards shape personal choices. Widely performed in East Asia, this procedure creates a crease in the eyelid, often aligning facial features more closely with Western beauty ideals. While marketed as a way to “enhance” beauty, it raises complex emotional and psychological concerns. The pressure to conform can lead to feelings of inadequacy, self-doubt, and a distorted sense of identity. Functionally, the risks of surgery—such as scarring, infections, or complications—can be harmful. These procedures are not without their dangers, and the pursuit of beauty should not come at the cost of physical health or mental well-being. Surgeons, particularly those working in private practices, may feel pressured to comply with patient requests to maintain a profitable business.In this environment, doctors may not always be incentivized to act in the patient’s best interest.